Postbank Finanzberatung
33 Employer Review(s)
Colleagues:
Supervisor:
Tasks:
Salary:
Career:
OVERALL:
Location
#
Country
Date
Rating
Review
Berlin 1
19.01.2011
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Functioning collegiality. Useful management. Filling employment. Fair payments. Average recognition. Satisfactory employment site.
Berlin 2
03.05.2008
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Functioning collegiality. Need to improve personnel management. No filling operation. Demotivating income. Rickety ladder of success. Not recommendable employer.
Berlin 3
28.01.2014
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Pleasant cooperation. Good Management. Interesting tasks. Recommendable workplace.
Berlin 4
23.07.2013
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Pleasant cooperation. Need to improve personnel management. No filling operation. Lower wage level. Rare upgrades. Reasonable job provider.
Berlin 5
21.03.2012
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Lack of unity. Need to improve personnel management. Filling employment. Demotivating income. Rickety ladder of success. Employers with criticisms.
Bonn 6
12.03.2008
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Lack of community spirit. Problematic management style. Mere Work carried out. Below-average salary. Rare upgrades. Employers with criticisms.
Bonn 7
02.08.2011
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Functioning collegiality. Need to improve personnel management. Filling employment. Demotivating income. Rickety ladder of success. Satisfactory employment site.
Bonn 8
01.10.2010
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Recommendable workplace.
Bonn 9
05.12.2011
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Functioning collegiality. Useful management. Acceptable service. Fair payments. Beneficial career. Satisfactory employment site.
Bonn 10
26.04.2010
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Functioning collegiality. Useful management. Interesting tasks. Below-average salary. Beneficial career. Recommendable workplace.
Bonn 11
01.04.2008
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Lack of unity. Problematic management style. Mere Work carried out. Below-average salary. Average recognition. Not recommendable employer.
Bonn 12
03.04.2008
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Lack of unity. Problematic management style. Mere Work carried out. Demotivating income. Rickety ladder of success. Not recommendable employer.
Bonn 13
12.08.2014
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Lack of community spirit. Need to improve personnel management. No filling operation. Lower wage level. Rare upgrades. Not recommendable employer.
Bonn 14
28.10.2013
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Lack of community spirit. Problematic management style. Mere Work carried out. Lower wage level. Rare upgrades. Not recommendable employer.
Bonn 15
07.07.2011
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Lack of community spirit. Need to improve personnel management. No filling operation. Demotivating income. Rickety ladder of success. Not recommendable employer.
Braunschweig 16
11.08.2010
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Functioning collegiality. Need to improve personnel management. Interesting tasks. Demotivating income. Average recognition. Reasonable job provider.
Düsseldorf 17
11.10.2011
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Functioning collegiality. Need to improve personnel management. No filling operation. Below-average salary. Average recognition. Reasonable job provider.
Freiburg 18
04.06.2011
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Lack of community spirit. Problematic management style. No filling operation. Rare upgrades. Not recommendable employer.
Hamburg 19
11.08.2011
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Lack of community spirit. Need to improve personnel management. No filling operation. Lower wage level. Rare upgrades. Employers with criticisms.
Hamburg 20
29.06.2011
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Sufficient cohesion. Need to improve personnel management. Acceptable service. Fair payments. Rickety ladder of success. Reasonable job provider.
Germany 21
08.07.2017
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Germany 22
08.06.2016
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Germany 23
07.05.2009
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Sufficient cohesion. Useful management. Interesting tasks. High payments. Beneficial career. Satisfactory employment site.
Germany 24
15.07.2009
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Lack of unity. Problematic management style. No filling operation. Lower wage level. Rare upgrades. Not recommendable employer.
Germany 25
12.09.2009
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Pleasant cooperation. Good Management. Interesting tasks. High payments. Average recognition. Recommendable workplace.
Germany 26
06.08.2010
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Sufficient cohesion. Problematic management style. Filling employment. Not recommendable employer.
Germany 27
10.08.2010
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Not recommendable employer.
Germany 28
13.09.2010
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Lack of unity. Problematic management style. Filling employment. Lower wage level. Rare upgrades. Employers with criticisms.
Cologne 29
01.06.2011
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Sufficient cohesion. Satisfactory staff work. Interesting tasks. High payments. Beneficial career. Reasonable job provider.
Mainz 30
22.05.2012
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Lack of unity. Need to improve personnel management. Not recommendable employer.
Minden 31
13.12.2013
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Lack of community spirit. Problematic management style. Mere Work carried out. Lower wage level. Rare upgrades. Not recommendable employer.
Munich 32
18.11.2010
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Pleasant cooperation. Good Management. Interesting tasks. Fair payments. Good future prospects. Recommendable workplace.
Stuttgart 33
21.11.2016
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Employers with criticisms.
